Each Project will be presented to the workshop audience within the last two hours of the workshop. Each other group will grade the presentations according to the rubric below. I will also grade the presentations in this manner. The final grade will be an average of all assessments.
Rubric
Definitions of Ratings: Quality Indicators
5 = Acceptable as is, the level of scholarship demonstrates critical thinking and a mastery of all crucial elements.
4 = Acceptable as is, all crucial elements are included and adequately described.
3 = Approved, although revisions are strongly suggested in one or more important component(s) that are of markedly lesser quality than the rest of the quality indicators in this section.
2 = Must be revised and resubmitted because one or more essential component(s) are not satisfactorily described.
1 = Must be revised and resubmitted because one or more required element(s) are missing or previous requests for revision were ignored.
NA = Not Applicable. This quality indicator does not apply to the document.
Wiki: Created a wiki as a workspace and an invitation sent to instructor and other group members to join wiki. (5 pts.)
Topic: An engaging lesson that requires the development of an authentic, problem-based design by your group was selected and posted in the wiki. (5 pts.)
Lesson Plan & Outcomes: A Lesson Plan that includes outcomes was presented. (5 pts.)
Designing the Multimedia Lesson (10 points)
Overall Design: You identified the project lesson your group will present and the use of multimedia tools. (in wiki) (5 pts.)
Page Design: You identified all pages as per Project Instructions. (5 pts.)
Activity Modules (20 points)
Do Now: Multimedia Theory, Instruction, and use of Technology were demonstrated. (5 pts.)
Introductory Presentation: Multimedia Theory, Instruction, and use of Technology were demonstrated. (5 pts.)
Skills: Multimedia Theory, Instruction, and use of Technology were demonstrated. (5 pts.)
Authentic Assessment: Multimedia Theory, Instruction, and use of Technology were demonstrated. (5pts.)
Miscellaneous Considerations (30 points)
The following are included in your wiki project:
List of Technology and equipment needed for your lesson (projector, screen, laptops, other?) (5 tps.)
In the media you created for your workshop, you used at least three of the four categories of media presented in the multimedia. (5 pts.)Graphics and text *
Text to audio, or audio to text
Video, animations, and cartoons
Virtual Worlds
Other?
You included all the handouts you expect to use in your Multimedia Lesson (5 pts.)
The multimedia materials developed for this workshop met the multimedia principles of Mayer: Principles for Reducing Extraneous Processing (5 pts.)
Principles for Managing Essential Processing (5 pts.)
Principles for Fostering Generative Processing (5 pts.)
PEER ASSESSMENT
Each Project will be presented to the workshop audience within the last two hours of the workshop. Each other group will grade the presentations according to the rubric below. I will also grade the presentations in this manner. The final grade will be an average of all assessments.
Rubric
Definitions of Ratings: Quality Indicators
5 = Acceptable as is, the level of scholarship demonstrates critical thinking and a mastery of all crucial elements.
4 = Acceptable as is, all crucial elements are included and adequately described.
3 = Approved, although revisions are strongly suggested in one or more important component(s) that are of markedly lesser quality than the rest of the quality indicators in this section.
2 = Must be revised and resubmitted because one or more essential component(s) are not satisfactorily described.
1 = Must be revised and resubmitted because one or more required element(s) are missing or previous requests for revision were ignored.
NA = Not Applicable. This quality indicator does not apply to the document.
Principles for Reducing Extraneous Processing (5 pts.)